75HARD, and the illusion of separating art from artist?

I’ve been thinking about doing the 75HARD challenge.

If you’re not familiar with 75HARD, it’s a fitness challenge that first did the rounds years ago and has had a bit of a resurgence this year. The rules stipulate that every day, you must:

  • Drink 1 gallon of plain water
  • Perform 2 workouts of at least 45 minutes in length, at least 3 hours apart, one of which must be outside
  • Read 10 pages of a non-fiction book
  • Follow a diet (any diet, no cheats)
  • No alcohol
  • Take a progress photo

This isn’t a new thing, I’ve considered it several times, and even went so far as putting it on my 40tbif list last year before changing my mind and swapping it out for something else.

I love a challenge, this kind of thing keeps me focused, motivated and moving in the ‘right’ direction. Ollllld readers will recall me completing previous challenges like the whole30 and Dry January. To be honest, I don’t even think 75HARD sounds that hard (as someone who is already working out at least once daily, drinks plenty of water, eats a good diet etc) So why did I remove it from my list?

Because the creator of 75HARD is a fucking bellend. A MAGA-supporting, woman-hating, “I’m so rich and you could be too” hustle bro who makes my skin crawl.

When I’ve talked about this with other fitness enthusiasts, the general impression is that it’s ok, because He doesn’t benefit financially from people participating in the challenge, and “everyone knows” it’s 100% possible to separate someone’s art from the artist themself. Except I’m not so sure about that personally, and I really don’t want to appear — even for one minute — to be supporting a person like that.

I could recreate the challenge under my own terms, but if it’s the rigid rules of the original that appeal to me then I would effectively just be renaming it, which is pointless as it’d be instantly recogniseable as the original challenge.

I could do it privately and not tell a soul, and then nobody would know to make the connection in the first place, but I get the feeling that I would be a whole lot less successful if I didn’t share it to gather support to keep me going. (And this post rather undoes the “not tell a soul” part.)

Who knew that taking part in stupid online challenges came with a side order of ethical dilemma, eh.

2 comments so far

  1. adastra said:
    On 14 Jul at 10:36 am

    What a funny coincidence, I’ve been thinking for a few days about writing a similar blog post about separating the art from the artist (but concerning literature)😆 I will probably write it in the next couple of days.

    It’s a complex topic, but I think that nobody should be forbidden from appreciating someone else’s ideas even if the person who had that idea turned out to be a horrible person. Seeing and judging everything in black and white is IMHO not the right approach, and will just lead to an even more polarized world in our already extremely polarized world.

    BTW, if you’re taking daily pictures, I know a cool platform ;)

    Reply
    • Jem said:
      On 14 Jul at 10:51 am

      Yeah, this post very nearly ended up being a 800 word essay / rant about a certain wizarding author & the impact of …ALL THAT… but I decided that was best kept to another time 😬

      I think my autistic black and white thinking does me no favours in situations like this! Like you say, realistically it’s not helpful and definitely polarizing but it’s my default and I have to actively convince myself to choose the middle ground sometimes. 🫣

      Reply

Leave a Comment

Please read the comment policy before leaving a comment. Click here to cancel reply.